In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Targeting Cardiac Macrophages in the Treatment of Ischemic Injury and Heart Failure

Commented by the ESC WG on Cardiovascular Regenerative & Reparative Medicine

Basic Science - Cardiac Diseases - Gene Therapy, Cell Therapy

Recent literature underscores the significance of macrophages in cardiac repair and regeneration, extending far beyond their traditional inflammatory and phagocytic roles. Several subsets of macrophages have been identified, each with distinct phenotypes, functions, and interactions within the cardiac environment, illustrating the complexity and diversity of their roles. Their adaptive capabilities, notably their phenotypic switch from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory and reparative states, are crucial in orchestrating a reparative response. Restorative macrophages promote angiogenesis while preventing excessive fibrosis or maladaptive remodelling in the outcome of ischemic injury. The balanced interaction between the different macrophage subsets, the other cardiac cells (cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells), and the extracellular matrix is critical in determining the outcome after cardiac injury. Two major types of macrophages, identified as CCR2+ and CCR2- (Bajpal et al, 2019) , are monocyte-derived and tissue-resident, respectively. The crosstalk between these subsets is essential to promote healing and stimulate angiogenesis and fibrosis inhibition. Distinct subsets such as TIM4+/TIMD4- (Dick, 2019) or MerTK+/MerTK- (DeBerge, 2017) have gained more attention.

The recent study of Shao et al. (2024) enriches our understanding of cardiac repair mechanisms. The authors shed light on the intricate role of Activating Transcription Factor 3 (ATF3). The GAS6-ATF3 axis regulates the fate of MerTK+ cardiac macrophages, influencing their survival and proliferation. The administration of GAS6 improves cardiac repair in an ATF3-dependent manner.

Finally, a growing body of evidence, including the current study on ATF3, highlights the transcription factor's role in modulating macrophage function and underscores the potential of targeted therapies. These could include microRNA-based approaches or manipulations of specific macrophage subsets for improved cardiac repair. For instance, studies by Bejerano et al. (2018), Deniset et al. (Immunity, 2019), and Borrego et al. (2022) illustrate, respectively, the potential of microRNA-based therapies, the role of Gata6+ pericardial cavity macrophages, and macrophage conditioning in cardiac healing or anti-fibrotic functions post-myocardial infarction.

In conclusion, the cumulative research on cardiac macrophages opens new avenues for therapeutic strategies to modulate these cells for optimal cardiac repair. Therefore, understanding the nuanced roles of different macrophage types and their interactions with other cardiac cells is pivotal in developing effective treatments.

References


Bajpai G, Bredemeyer A, Li W, Zaitsev K, Koenig AL, Lokshina I, Mohan J, Ivey B, Hsiao HM, Weinheimer C, Kovacs A, Epelman S, Artyomov M, Kreisel D, Lavine KJ. Tissue Resident CCR2- and CCR2+ Cardiac Macrophages Differentially Orchestrate Monocyte Recruitment and Fate Specification Following Myocardial Injury. Circ Res. 2019 Jan 18;124(2):263-278. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314028

Dick SA, Macklin JA, Nejat S, Momen A, Clemente-Casares X, Althagafi MG, Chen J, Kantores C, Hosseinzadeh S, Aronoff L, Wong A, Zaman R, Barbu I, Besla R, Lavine KJ, Razani B, Ginhoux F, Husain M, Cybulsky MI, Robbins CS, Epelman S. Self-renewing resident cardiac macrophages limit adverse remodeling following myocardial infarction. Nat Immunol. 2019 Jan;20(1):29-39. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0272-2

DeBerge M, Yeap XY, Dehn S, Zhang S, Grigoryeva L, Misener S, Procissi D, Zhou X, Lee DC, Muller WA, Luo X, Rothlin C, Tabas I, Thorp EB. MerTK Cleavage on Resident Cardiac Macrophages Compromises Repair After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Circ Res. 2017 Sep 29;121(8):930-940. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311327

Shao, Y., Li, Y., Liu, Y. et al. ATF3 coordinates the survival and proliferation of cardiac macrophages and protects against ischemia–reperfusion injury. Nat Cardiovasc Res 3, 28–45 (2024). 
Bejerano T, Etzion S, Elyagon S, Etzion Y, Cohen S. Nanoparticle Delivery of miRNA-21 Mimic to Cardiac Macrophages Improves Myocardial Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction. Nano Lett. 2018 Sep 12;18(9):5885-5891. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02578. Epub 2018 Aug 29. 

Deniset JF, Belke D, Lee WY, Jorch SK, Deppermann C, Hassanabad AF, Turnbull JD, Teng G, Rozich I, Hudspeth K, Kanno Y, Brooks SR, Hadjantonakis AK, O'Shea JJ, Weber GF, Fedak PWM, Kubes P. Gata6+ Pericardial Cavity Macrophages Relocate to the Injured Heart and Prevent Cardiac Fibrosis. Immunity. 2019 Jul 16;51(1):131-140.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.010

Borrego I, Frobert A, Ajalbert G, Valentin J, Kaltenrieder C, Fellay B, Stumpe M, Cook S, Dengjel J, Giraud MN. Fibrin, Bone Marrow Cells and Macrophages Interactively Modulate Cardiomyoblast Fate. Biomedicines. 2022 Feb 23;10(3):527. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10030527

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.

Contact us

ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Regenerative and Reparative Medicine

European Society of Cardiology

European Heart House
Les Templiers
2035 Route des Colles
CS 80179 Biot

06903, Sophia Antipolis, FR

Tel: +33.4.92.94.76.00