In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Sympathetic overdrive in hypertension: clinical and therapeutic relevance

An article from the e-journal of the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice

Recently, there has been renewed interest in the role of the sympathetic nervous system in hypertension for several reasons: 1) findings that sympathetic abnormalities can influence the development and progression of target organ damage; 2) the development of new therapeutic approaches for the control of blood pressure; and 3) findings that sympathetic activation has an adverse prognostic effect in terms of morbidity and mortality on a variety of cardiovascular diseases. This underlines the importance of the modulation of sympathetic activation as a goal for non-pharmacological as well as pharmacological interventions aimed at lowering elevated blood pressure values. Data, however, remain scarce and further research is required to define the role of genetic factors, the relationship between sympathetic function and target organ damage, and the effects of combination drug treatments on sympathetic neural function and its relationship with blood pressure control.

Hypertension

Background

The renewed interest of investigators and clinicians the role of the sympathetic nervous system in hypertension and its relevance as a target for non-pharmacological as well as pharmacological interventions comes from a number of sources. First, the recent finding that sympathetic abnormalities favor the development and progression of target organ damage, independently from blood pressure overload [1,2]. Second, the availability of new therapeutic approaches for the treatment and control of high blood pressure in high-risk conditions such as resistant hypertension, i.e., carotid baroreceptor stimulation and renal nerve radiofrequency ablation [2]. Finally, there is the finding that, in a variety of major cardiovascular diseases, such as congestive heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction and renal failure-related hypertension, sympathetic activation has an independent adverse prognostic relevance in terms of both morbidity and mortality [3-7].

Taken together, these findings underscore the importance of the modulation of sympathetic activation as a goal for non-pharmacological as well as pharmacological interventions aimed at lowering elevated blood pressure values.

Sympathetic activation in hypertension

Essential hypertensive states have been shown to be characterized not only by an impaired parasympathetic tone but also by marked sympathetic overdrive, with a resulting increase in resting heart rate values [1]. The sympathetic activation contributes to this haemodynamic alteration, due to the well-known positive chronotropic effects of the main adrenergic neurotransmitter, norepinephrine [1]. The two neurogenic abnormalities appear to be already present in the pre-hypertensive stage or in borderline hypertension (2). However, while vagal dysfunction remains stable in magnitude in clinical conditions characterized by more severe increases in blood pressure, sympathetic activation undergoes a progressive potentiation as the severity of the hypertensive state increases [8]. This has been shown particularly via direct approaches to investigate human sympathetic function, such as clinical microneurography, which, by directly recording efferent postganglionic sympathetic neural discharge in the peroneal or brachial nerve in man, allows the well-known limitations of plasma norepinephrine assay as an adrenergic marker to be overcome [2].

The above-mentioned sympathetic dysregulation has been shown in the different stages of hypertension (mild, moderate, severe), in hypertensive forms of young, middle-aged and elderly patients, in white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension and pregnancy-induced high blood pressure [1,2]. Recently, other clinical conditions found to be associated with sympathetic overactivity have been documented. They include dipping or non-dipping hypertension, hypertension complicated by sleep apnoea, metabolic syndrome or renal failure, and true resistant hypertension [1,2,9]. Finally, it should be mentioned that: 1) secondary forms of hypertension, such as renovascular hypertension, do not appear to be associated with sympathetic activation, and 2) the mechanisms responsible for the hypertension-related adrenergic overdrive appear to be complex, including alterations in the neurogenic, reflex as well as metabolic modulation of the sympathetic tone [1,2].

Clinical relevance of the hypertension-related sympathetic overactivity

Direct and indirect evidence is now available that a state of sympathetic activation promotes cardiac and vascular alterations, thus contributing to the elevated morbidity and mortality described in untreated hypertension [1,2]. As far as cardiac alterations are concerned, there is evidence that a heightened cardiac sympathetic drive is detected in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or even with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, underlining the concept that factors other than blood pressure elevation are of key importance for determining the myocardial structural and functional alterations detectable in the clinical course of the hypertensive state [10,11]. In addition, sympathetic activation has been shown to participate in the development and progression of vascular remodelling, endothelial dysfunction as well as in the increase in arterial stiffening reported in the hypertensive state [12,13]. Finally, recent studies show that both the metabolic and renal abnormalities which characterize not only advanced but also earlier stages of hypertension are indeed associated with sympathetic alterations, which appear to potentiate the adrenergic overdrive already seen in uncomplicated hypertension [14,15].

Sympathoinhibition as a goal of antihypertensive drug treatment

As illustrated in Table 1, a reduction in sympathetic cardiovascular drive may trigger a series of favorable cardiovascular and cardiometabolic consequences. Those more relevant from a clinical view point include: 1) a homogeneous blood pressure control during a 24-hour period, 2) a reduction in 24-hour blood pressure variability, 3) a regression of target organ damage, and 4) an improvement of the metabolic abnormalities associated with hypertension. Conversely, of a totally opposite nature are the cardiovascular and cardiometabolic consequences of sympathoexcitatory drugs (Table 1), which favor, again directly or indirectly, 1) a lesser homogeneous blood pressure control, 2) a greater blood pressure variability, and 3) reduced cardiac organ damage regression as well as a worsening of the metabolic abnormalities associated with hypertension.

Table 1. Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of antihypertensive drugs according to their sympathetic action.

 

Sympathoinhibitory drugs

Sympathoexcitatory drugs

Heart rate and myocardial oxygen demand

decrease

increase

Coronary vascular resistance

 

decrease

increase

Blood pressure variability

decrease

increase

Insulin resistance

decrease

increase

LVH and vascular remodelling

decrease

no change

Cardiac and vascular protection

increase

decrease

LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy

Sympathetic effects of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions

As far as non-pharmacological interventions are con­cerned, there is overwhelming evidence demonstrating the sympathomodulatory effects of low-calorie dietary interventions and regular physical exercise programs [16,17]. Since both procedures trigger clear-cut blood pres­sure-lowering effects of a magnitude often related to the degree of the sympathoinhibition, the hypothesis has been advanced that the antihypertensive effects of the two inter­ventions are related to their sympathoinhibitory effects [16,17]. Conversely, an enhancement of the already elevated adrenergic drive has been reported during a long-term and marked low sodium diet [16,17]. This is presumably related to the fact that marked dietary sodium restriction elicits hyperinsu­linemia and renin-angiotensin stimulation, i.e., two effects which promote sympathoexcitation and impair baroreflex control of both vagal and sympathetic drive [1,2]. Recently, two invasive procedures, i.e., implantation of a device capable of stimulating the carotid baroreceptor (and thus inhibiting sympathetic activity and enhancing barore­flex control of cardiac vagal drive), and renal sympathetic denervation through a catheter positioned in a renal artery and connected to a radiofrequency generator, have been successfully developed. They are both under clinical investigation to define their blood pressure-lowering effects, which may be associated with a reduction in sympathetic drive [18,19].

 s far as the effects of antihypertensive drug treatment on autonomic cardiovascular function are concerned, there is evidence that, as shown in Table 2, some pharmacologic classes of antihy­pertensive drugs (such as beta-blockers, ace-inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers) may elicit profound sympathoinhibitory effects, while other classes may leave unchanged (long-acting calcium antagonists), or even further increase (diuretics, short-acting calcium antag­onists), the adrenergic cardiovascular drive [16, 20-22]. Information on the effects of different antihypertensive drug combinations on autonomic cardiovascular function is scarce at present and mainly based on indirect, and thus less sensitive, markers of sympathetic drive such as plasma norepinephrine.

Table 2. Effects of different antihypertensive drug classes on peripheral and cardiac sympathetic drive.

Drug class

Effects on peripheral SNS

Effects on cardiac SNS

Central sympatholytics

marked reduction

reduction

α-blockers

marked reduction

no change

Thiazide diuretics

marked increase

no change

Anti-aldosterone agents

reduction

no change

β-blockers

reduction

marked reduction

Short-acting CA

marked increase

marked increase

Long-acting CA

reduction, no change

no change, increase

ACE inhibitors

reduction, no change

no change

Angiotensin II receptor blockers

reduction, no change

no change

ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; CA: calcium antagonists; SNS: sympathetic nervous system

Conclusions

A number of issues related to the role of the sympathetic nervous system in hypertension remain to be defined:

  • the role of genetic factors in hypertension-related sympathetic overdrive;
  • the relationship between the various indices of sympathetic function and the novel markers of target organ damage/arterial dysfunction; and
  • the effects of combination drug treatment on sympathetic neural function and its possible relationship with blood pressure control.

References


  1. Mancia G, Grassi G. The autonomic nervous system and hypertension. Circ Res. 2014 May 23;114(11):1804-14.
  2. Grassi G, Mark A, Esler M. The sympathetic nervous system alterations in human hypertension. Circ Res. 2015 Mar 13;116(6):976-90.
  3. Cohn JN, Levine TB, Olivari MT, Garberg V, Lura D, Francis GS, Simon AB, Rector T. Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1984 Sep 27;311(13):819-23.
  4. Brunner-La Rocca HP, Esler MD, Jennings GL, Kaye DM. Effect of cardiac sympathetic nervous activity on mode of death in congestive heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2001 Jul;22(13):1136-43.
  5. Sander D, Winbeck K, Klingelhöfer J, Etgen T. Conrad B. Prognostic relevance of pathological sympathetic activation after acute thromboembolic stroke. Neurology. 2001 Sep 11;57(5):833-8.
  6. Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, Parlongo S, Cutrupi S, Benedetto FA, Tripepi G, Bonanno G, Rapisarda F, Fatuzzo P, Seminara G, Cataliotti A, Stancanelli B, Malatino LS. Plasma norepinephrine predicts survival and incident cardiovascular events in patients with end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 2002 Mar 19;105(11):1354-9.
  7. Barretto AC, Santos AC, Munhoz R, Rondon MU, Franco FG, Trombetta IC, Roveda F, de Matos LN, Braga AM, Middlekauff HR, Negrão CE. Increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity predicts mortality in heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Jul 10;135(3):302-7.
  8. Grassi G, Cattaneo BM, Seravalle G, Lanfranchi A, Mancia G. Baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity in essential and secondary hypertension. Hypertension. 1998 Jan;31(1):68-72.
  9. Grassi G, Seravalle G, Brambilla G, Pini C, Alimento M, Facchetti R, Spaziani D, Cuspidi C, Mancia G. Marked sympathetic activation and baroreflex dysfunction in true resistant hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 20;177(3):1020-5.
  10. Burns J, Sivananthan ML, Ball SG, Mackintosh AE, Mary DA, Greenwood JP. Relationship between central sympathetic drive and magnetic resonance determined left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Circulation. 2007 Apr 17;115(15):1999-2005.
  11. Grassi G, Seravalle G, Quarti-Trevano F, Dell'Oro R, Arenare F, Spaziani D, Mancia G. Sympathetic and baroreflex cardiovascular control in hypertension-related left ventricualr diastolic dysfunction. Hypertension. 2009 Feb;53(2):205-9.
  12. Laurent S, Safar ME. Large artery damage: measurement and clinical importance. In: Mancia G, Grassi G, Redon J (eds). Manual of Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension. CRC Press (London) 2014: p191-201.
  13. Heagerty AM, Withers SB, Izzard AS, Greenstein AS, Aghamohammadzadeh R. Small artery structure and function in hypertension. In: Mancia G, Grassi G, Redon J (eds). Manual of Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension. CRC Press (London) 2014:203-210.
  14. Esler M, Straznicky N, Eikelis N, Masuo K, Lambert G, Lambert E. Mechanisms of sympathetic activation in obesity-related hypertension. Hypertension. 2006 Nov;48(5):787-96.
  15. Grassi G, Quarti-Trevano F, Seravalle G, Arenare F, Volpe M, Furiani S, Dell'Oro R, Mancia G. Early sympathetic activation in the initial clinical stages of chronic renal failure. Hypertension. 2011 Apr;57(4):846-51.
  16. Grassi G. Counteracting the sympathetic nervous sytem in hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2004 Sep;13(5):513-9.
  17. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redón J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, Christiaens T, Cifkova R, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Galderisi M, Grobbee DE, Jaarsma T, Kirchhof P, Kjeldsen SE, Laurent S, Manolis AJ, Nilsson PM, Ruilope LM, Schmieder RE, Sirnes PA, Sleight P, Viigimaa M, Waeber B, Zannad F; Task Force Members. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013 Jul;31(7):1281-357.
  18. Bisognano JD, Bakris G, Nadim MK, Sanchez L, Kroon AA, Schafer J, de Leeuw PW, Sica DA. Baroreflex activation therapy lowers blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):765-73.
  19. Grassi G, Seravalle G, Brambilla G, Trabattoni D, Cuspidi C, Corso R, Pieruzzi F, Genovesi S, Stella A, Facchetti R, Spaziani D, Bartorelli A, Mancia G. Blood pressure responses to renal denervation precede and are independent of the sympathetic and baroreflex effects. Hypertension. 2015 Jun;65(6):1209-16.
  20.  Sica D. Centrally acting antihypertensive agents: an update. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 May;9(5):399-405.
  21. Wray DW, Supiano MA. Impact of aldosterone receptor blockade compared with thiazide therapy on sympathetic nervous system function in geriatric hypertension. Hypertension. 2010 May;55(5):1217-23.
  22.  Neumann J, Ligtenberg G, Oey L, Koomans HA, Blankestjin P. Moxonidine normalizes sympathetic hyperactivity in patients with eprosartan-treated chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Nov;15(11):2902-7.

Notes to editor


Author:

Prof. Guido Grassi

Clinica Medica, University of Milano-Bicocca

Ospedale San Gerardo dei Tintori

Via Pergolesi 33, 20052 Monza (Milano), Italy

Phone: +39 039 2336005

Fax: +39 039 2336001

E-mail: guido.grassi@unimib.it

 

Conflict of interest: No conflicts of interest to declare.

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.