In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Lipidology update: targets and timing of well-established therapies

Summary

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary target in lipid-lowering strategies.  The goal of treatment depends on the level of individual risk in each patient, the goal of which is going to be lower in higher risk patients. The latest European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines and other recent literature underline that the maximum achievable reduction of LDL-C leads to the maximum attainable reduction in vascular events. This leads towards intensification of LDL-C-lowering therapy, particularly in the higher risk categories of patients, with the challenging targets of <55 mg/dl and <40 mg/dl in selected patients in the very high-risk population. As a combination therapy, a healthy lifestyle is essential, and statins are the initial drug therapy for all patients including the elderly. The addition of ezetimibe and of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) help reach target levels according to severity or risk. New evidence demonstrates that pursuing target levels in patients with acute vascular events should begin as early as possible.

Lipids

Take-home messages

  1. Lowering LDL-C is a primary target in the whole population.
  2. There are no known adverse events linked to very low LDL-C levels; patients with high very/high risk have lower LDL-C goals.
  3. Statins are the first-line recommended drug treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk reducing Apo-B-containing lipoprotein and true statin intolerance, though documented, is rare.

 

Impact on practice statement

  • Since true statin intolerance is rare, it is worth to consider maintaining this drug treatment in patients who report statin-associated muscle symptoms as adverse effect.
  • Since no known adverse events have been linked to very low LDL-C levels, we have to avoid the fear of overtreatment and treat according to target levels.
  • Older adults with atherosclerotic vascular disease should be treated as younger patients.
  • Initiating lipid-lowering therapies using high-dose statins, or high-dose statins plus ezetimibe and/or PCSK9i in acute vascular events appears to be beneficial.

 

(For “New drugs treatments”: see the article of Dr Dimitri Richter in this series.)

Lipidology update: targets and timing of well-established therapies 

The latest guidelines on dyslipidaemias and cardiovascular disease prevention, such as the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC)/Multisociety Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol, the 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias, the 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical and the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia, underline the causal role of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in determining atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) [1-4].

All the current guidelines emphasise the need for a lifelong healthy lifestyle and focus on individual cardiovascular (CV) risk in order to set specific recommendations including drug treatment initiation and LDL-C targets to be obtained. They also identify risk-modifying and risk-enhancing factors to be considered in decision-making about therapy. LDL-C goals in the European guidelines are more stringent, particularly for patients at high risk or above compared to other guidelines [1-5].

The lipid goals are the same in the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia Guidelines and in the 2021 ESC Prevention of CV Disease Guidelines, though the latter suggests a stepwise approach to treatment goals except for very high-risk patients. The ESC guidelines reinforce the idea that the absolute benefit from LDL-C reduction depends on both the absolute risk of ASCVD and the absolute reduction in LDL-C especially since there is no known adverse events have been linked to very low LDL-C levels.

Risk categories

Table 1 shows the definitions of patient risk, according to the the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias [2]. An individual’s global risk can be reclassified by the presence of certain risk modifying factors such as social deprivation, immune/inflammatory diseases, atrial fibrillation, or a family history of premature cardiovascular disease. A computed tomography (CT) calcium score may be useful in treatment strategies when the LCL-C goal cannot be achieved by lifestyle intervention. It is particularly relevant to consider risk modifier factors in subjects at low/moderate risk to avoid underestimating the actual risk.

A lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] measurement – one of the so-called “risk-modifying and enhancing factors”- should be considered at least once in the life of every adult to identify those with very high inherited Lp(a) levels (>180 mg/dL). In select patients at moderate risk with high Lp(a) values, this measurement may be used to reclassify their risk level to a higher level.

 

Table 1. Risk categories and LDL-C targets. 

Risk categories

Clinical data

LDL-C Target

Very high-risk

ASCVD, either clinical or unequivocal on imaging (CT scan included in these guidelines)

Diabetes mellitus with target organ damage, long standing duration (>20 years), or associated with other risk factors

eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with ASCVD or with another major risk factor

SCORE >10%

<55 mg/dL both in primary and secondary prevention

<40 mg/dL in selected patients with recurrent ASCVD

High-risk

Markedly elevated single risk factors, including total cholesterol >310 mg/dL, LDL-C >190 mg/dL or blood pressure >180/110 mmHg

FH without other risk factors

Diabetes with a duration >10 years or with another risk factor

eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2

Calculated SCORE >5% and <10%
<70 mg/dL
Moderate-risk  

Younger patients (Type 1 diabetes mellitus <35 years; Type 2 diabetes mellitus <50 years) with diabetes mellitus duration <10 years, without other risk factors

Calculated SCORE >1 % and <5%;

<100 mg/dL should be considered

Low-risk Low-risk calculated SCORE <1% fatal cardiovascular disease <116 mg/dL may be considered

(Summary reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology from reference [2] Mach F, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455. https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines/Dyslipidaemias-Management-of

ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CT: computed tomography; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; FH: familial hypercholesterolaemia; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

 

Targets

The goal of treatment is to obtain the lowest possible LDL-C level by intensifying treatment appropriately, remembering the precept that there is no “too low threshold” for lowering LDL-C levels) while, at the same time, taking into consideration risk categories, especially in patients at high or very high CV risk (Table 1).

Reaching you goals using well proven drug therapies

The well proven therapies recommended to reach the target level goals in the different risk categories of patients (Central Figure) are 1) the maximum tolerated dose of statins, and, if the targets are not achieved, 2) the addition of ezetimibe and then 3) proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i).

According to the concept that demonstrates ApoB-containing lipoproteins have a causal role in ASCVD, statins are the first choice for reducing triglycerides (TG) in patients at high risk with hypertriglyceridaemia >200mg/dL;  n-3 PUFAs and fibrates other potential pharmacological interventions can also be considered. For very high TG levels (associated with genetic causes and carrying an risk of acute pancreatitis), caloric and fat restriction, alcohol abstinence, and initiation of fibrate therapy, possibly in association with n-3 fatty acids, should be put in place.

 

Central Figure. The basics in the management of dyslipidaemia and the different parameters affecting the decision.

337_Guasti_FINAL FOR PUBLICATION_Central illustration.jpg 

Statin intolerance

Statin intolerance is a public health challenge, leading to statin discontinuation, underdosing and subsequent increases in CV events [6,7]. Statin-associated muscle symptoms are by far the most frequently reported adverse effects, with other possible statin-related adverse effects including hepatotoxicity, renal toxicity, potential impact on neurocognitive aspects, and haemorrhagic stroke [6-9]. A recent meta-analysis analysing more than 4 million patients confirms that the overall prevalence of statin intolerance is relatively low [6] with the prevalence being 9.1%, irrespective of the definition applied. However, when diagnosis was based on the approved definitions, the prevalence was less than 7% and less than 5% in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) [6].

Advanced age, hepatic or renal impairment, previous muscular, hepatic or other side effects, or a potential for interaction with concomitant therapies may be risk factors for statin intolerance.

Because of the catastrophic effects of statin withdrawal or suboptimal lipid-lowering therapy, meticulous evaluation of patients with so-called “statin intolerance,” mainly related to statin-induced muscle symptoms, and encouragement of adherence to statin therapy is necessary in order to reduce the risk of unnecessary discontinuation of these drugs.

Special populations: the elderly

Lipid-lowering therapies should be used in older patients with ASCVD as in younger people. This is a strong recommendation from the ESC guidelines. The 2019 ESC Guidelines on dyslipidaemias recommend treating older patients with ASCVD to target levels similar to those for younger patients. This is further supported by a systematic review and meta-analysis showing that lipid-lowering was as effective in patients >75 years old in reducing CV events as it was in patients <75 years [10]. These data were obtained in 21,492 (8.8% of the total population of 244,090 patients from 29 trials) aged at least 75 years, 11,750 (54·7%) of whom were from statin trials, 6,209 (28.9%) from ezetimibe trials, and 3,533 (16.4%) from PCSK9i trials [10].

Moreover, lipid-lowering treatment had a relative clinical benefit in the primary prevention of major vascular events in individuals aged ≥70 years, similarly as in individuals aged <70 years [11] as well as in reducing overall mortality [12].

Although frailty is considered as a potential cause of statin intolerance and is a potential challenge in initiating lipid-lowering treatments, new statin use in the elderly was associated with a lower risk of mortality and major adverse CV events, independent of frailty in a large population of 710,313 veterans (mean age [±standard deviation] 75.3 [±6.5], 98% male, 89% white) of whom, 86,327 (12.1%) were frail [13].

According to ESC guidelines, in primary prevention, people ≤75 years old should be treated according to their level of risk whereas older subjects may be considered for initiation of statin treatment if at high or very high risk. The recommendation is to start with lower doses based on comorbidities - in particular renal impairment - altering pharmacokinetics, with potential accumulation and drug-drug interactions, and then titrate to target levels with caution [2].

Special populations: early lipid-lowering treatment in acute coronary syndrome

The benefits of statins in secondary prevention are well established [14], and numerous RCTs have shown the benefits granted by early and intensive statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) [15,16]. RCTs have consistently demonstrated that lower LDL-C levels after ACS are unequivocally associated with lower CV event rates [17]. A meta-analysis of trials comparing more intensive vs less intensive LDL-C lowering with statins indicated that more intensive statin therapy was associated with more significant CV risk reduction [18]. For every 1.0 mmol/L reduction in LDL-C, further reduction in risk was similar to the proportional reductions in the trials of statins vs control. Consequently, statins are recommended in all patients with ACS, irrespective of LDL-C concentration at hospitalisation.

ACS present a “time-dependent” pattern of complication rates, with the highest risk for thrombotic complications and cardiac death in the first weeks/months following hospital admission [19-23]. Thus lipid-lowering treatment should be started as early as possible, to tackle LDL-C in the moment of maximum risk [19-21,23] and to enhance patient adherence after discharge. Moreover, lipid-lowering treatment should be given as high-intensity treatment, as this is associated with early and sustained clinical benefits [24]. Thus, it is recommended that a high-intensity statin (e.g. atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) is initiated as early as possible after hospital admission, preferably before planned percutaneous coronary intervention, and prescribed up to the highest tolerated dose in order to reach the LDL-C goals [2,23,25].

The intensity of statin therapy should be higher in those receiving a low- or moderate-intensity statin treatment at presentation unless they have a history of intolerance to high-intensity statin therapy or other characteristics that may influence safety [18,26,27]. The current treatment goal for secondary prevention is to lower LDL-C to <55 mg/dL and to achieve a ≥50% LDL-C reduction from baseline. For patients who experience a second adverse CV event (not necessarily of the same type) within two years, an LDL-C goal of <40 mg/dL appears to confer additional benefit [2,28-30]. Lower-intensity statin therapy might be appropriate in patients with risk factors for statin intolerance [2].

Following ACS and especially within the first 24 hours after myocardial infarction with ST elevation (STEMI), the lipid profile exhibits phasic changes characterised by small reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and increases in TG [31,32]. Thus, a lipid profile should be obtained as early as possible after admission for STEMI (even non-fasting) to represent the baseline patient lipidic metabolism realistically, as total cholesterol and HDL-C show slight diurnal variation and LDL-C’s variation is within 10% [33]. Blood lipids and creatine-kinase levels should be reassessed 4–6 weeks after the ACS to determine whether the recommended LDL target levels have been reached and to exclude safety issues. The lipid-lowering therapy can then be titrated accordingly, and, if the LDL-C goal is not achieved despite the maximum tolerated dose of a statin used, adding ezetimibe is recommended [2,34]. Initiation of PCSK9i treatment is recommended in patients failing to reach their LDL-C goal despite maximum tolerated statin and ezetimibe therapy [2, 23, 28, 29]. Finally, icosapentethyl, at a dose of 2g b.i.d., might be added to statins in patients with TG levels of 1.5–5.6 mmol/L (135–499 mg/dL) despite statin treatment [2,23,35].

 

Trial results with high doses of atorvastatin and simvastatin [18,36,37] favour a high-intensity statin treatment for ACS patients. In statin intolerants, treatment with ezetimibe should be considered. Ezetimibe could also be used in combination with statins as an initial therapeutic strategy, based upon the results of the “Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial” (IMPROVE-IT) [34]. In this study, 18,144 patients with a recent ACS (29% with STEMI) were randomised to either ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 40mg or simvastatin 40mg alone. Over a 7-year follow up, the combined treatment arm compared with the statin-only arm showed significantly lower rates of the composite primary endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospital readmission for unstable angina, coronary revascularisation, or stroke (32.7% vs 34.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–0.99). Adding ezetimibe to statins was safe and provided long-term benefits for CV outcomes.

Thus, if ACS patients have baseline LDL-C levels which indicate that it is unlikely that target levels will be reached with statin therapy alone, initiating ezetimibe in addition to a statin (or a statin-plus-ezetimibe combination treatment) should be considered during the ACS hospitalisation [2,23,34].

Recent data from PCSK9i phase 1-3 trials demonstrated that PCSK9i decrease LDL-C up to 60%, either as monotherapy or in addition to a statin dose, with additional beneficial effects over TG and HDL-C levels [38-41]. Meta-analyses of trials enrolling more than 10,000 patients indicated a significant mortality benefit (HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23–0.86) but focused upon relatively few endpoints [39,42].

In the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial consisting of more than 27,000 patients with ASCVD, additional risk factors, and LDL 70 mg/dL, who were already receiving moderate or high-intensity statin therapy as compared to placebo, evolocumab reduced the primary composite endpoint of CV death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalisation for unstable angina, or coronary revascularisation by 15% at the relative rate and by 1.5% at the absolute rate. There were no differences in all-cause or CV mortality or significant differences in adverse events [28]. Based on this relatively limited body of evidence, clinicians should consider adding a non-statin pharmacological treatment to high-risk patients failing to reach LDL-C targets after ACS despite the maximum tolerated dose of statin.


References


  1. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, Goldberg R, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones D, Lopez-Pajares N, Ndumele CE, Orringer CE, Peralta CA, Saseen JJ, Smith SC Jr, Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3168-3209.
  2. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188.
  3. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, Benetos A, Biffi A, Boavida JM, Capodanno D, Cosyns B, Crawford C, Davos CH, Desormais I, Di Angelantonio E, Franco OH, Halvorsen S, Hobbs FDR, Hollander M, Jankowska EA, Michal M, Sacco S, Sattar N, Tokgozoglu L, Tonstad S, Tsioufis KP, van Dis I, van Gelder IC, Wanner C, Williams B; ESC National Cardiac Societies; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 7;42(34):3227-3337.
  4. Pearson GJ, Thanassoulis G, Anderson TJ, Barry AR, Couture P, Dayan N, Francis GA, Genest J, Grégoire J, Grover SA, Gupta M, Hegele RA, Lau D, Leiter LA, Leung AA, Lonn E, Mancini GBJ, Manjoo P, McPherson R, Ngui D, Piché ME, Poirier P, Sievenpiper J, Stone J, Ward R, Wray W. 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults. Can J Cardiol. 2021 Aug;37(8):1129-1150.
  5. Aygun S, Tokgozoglu L. Comparison of Current International Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia. J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 6;11(23):7249.
  6. Bytyçi I, Penson PE, Mikhailidis DP, Wong ND, Hernandez AV, Sahebkar A, Thompson PD, Mazidi M, Rysz J, Pella D, Reiner Ž, Toth PP, Banach M. Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2022 Sep 7;43(34):3213-3223.
  7. Serban MC, Colantonio LD, Manthripragada AD, Monda KL, Bittner VA, Banach M, Chen L, Huang L, Dent R, Kent ST, Muntner P, Rosenson RS. Statin Intolerance and Risk of Coronary Heart Events and All-Cause Mortality Following Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 21;69(11):1386-1395.
  8. Rosenson RS, Baker S, Banach M, Borow KM, Braun LT, Bruckert E, Brunham LR, Catapano AL, Elam MB, Mancini GBJ, Moriarty PM, Morris PB, Muntner P, Ray KK, Stroes ES, Taylor BA, Taylor VH, Watts GF, Thompson PD. Optimizing Cholesterol Treatment in Patients With Muscle Complaints. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 5;70(10):1290-1301.
  9. Stroes ES, Thompson PD, Corsini A, Vladutiu GD, Raal FJ, Ray KK, Roden M, Stein E, Tokgözoğlu L, Nordestgaard BG, Bruckert E, De Backer G, Krauss RM, Laufs U, Santos RD, Hegele RA, Hovingh GK, Leiter LA, Mach F, März W, Newman CB, Wiklund O, Jacobson TA, Catapano AL, Chapman MJ, Ginsberg HN; European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy-European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel Statement on Assessment, Aetiology and Management. Eur Heart J. 2015 May 1;36(17):1012-22.
  10. Gencer B, Marston NA, Im K, Cannon CP, Sever P, Keech A, Braunwald E, Giugliano RP, Sabatine MS. Efficacy and safety of lowering LDL cholesterol in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1637-1643.
  11. Andersson NW, Corn G, Dohlmann TL, Melbye M, Wohlfahrt J, Lund M. LDL-C Reduction With Lipid-Lowering Therapy for Primary Prevention of Major Vascular Events Among Older Individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Oct 3;82(14):1381-1391.
  12. Funaki D, Kaneda H, Miyakoshi A, Saito K, Sasaki H, Nakatani E. Identification of subgroups within a Japanese older adult population for whom statin therapy is effective in reducing mortality. PLoS One. 2023 Dec 1;18(12):e0295052.
  13. Orkaby AR, Lu B, Ho YL, Treu T, Galloway A, Wilson PWF, Cho K, Gaziano JM, Alexander KP, Gagnon DR, Djousse L, Forman DE, Driver JA. New statin use, mortality, and first cardiovascular events in older US Veterans by frailty status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Dec 6. [Epub ahead of print].
  14. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Buck G, Pollicino C, Kirby A, Sourjina T, Peto R, Collins R, Simes R; Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1267-78.
  15. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Rader DJ, Rouleau JL, Belder R, Joyal SV, Hill KA, Pfeffer MA, Skene AM; Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 Investigators. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 8;350(15):1495-504.
  16. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, Ganz P, Oliver MF, Waters D, Zeiher A, Chaitman BR, Leslie S, Stern T; Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) Study Investigators. Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001 Apr 4;285(13):1711-8.
  17. Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, Ray KK, Packard CJ, Bruckert E, Hegele RA, Krauss RM, Raal FJ, Schunkert H, Watts GF, Borén J, Fazio S, Horton JD, Masana L, Nicholls SJ, Nordestgaard BG, van de Sluis B, Taskinen MR, Tokgözoglu L, Landmesser U, Laufs U, Wiklund O, Stock JK, Chapman MJ, Catapano AL. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J. 2017 Aug 21;38(32):2459-2472.
  18. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration; Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, Peto R, Barnes EH, Keech A, Simes J, Collins R. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010 Nov 13;376(9753):1670-81.
  19. Jernberg T, Hasvold P, Henriksson M, Hjelm H, Thuresson M, Janzon M. Cardiovascular risk in post-myocardial infarction patients: nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long-term perspective. Eur Heart J. 2015 May 14;36(19):1163-70.
  20. Li S, Peng Y, Wang X, Qian Y, Xiang P, Wade SW, Guo H, Lopez JAG, Herzog CA, Handelsman Y. Cardiovascular events and death after myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke in an older Medicare population. Clin Cardiol. 2019 Mar;42(3):391-399.
  21. Schüpke S, Neumann FJ, Menichelli M, Mayer K, Bernlochner I, Wöhrle J, Richardt G, Liebetrau C, Witzenbichler B, Antoniucci D, Akin I, Bott-Flügel L, Fischer M, Landmesser U, Katus HA, Sibbing D, Seyfarth M, Janisch M, Boncompagni D, Hilz R, Rottbauer W, Okrojek R, Möllmann H, Hochholzer W, Migliorini A, Cassese S, Mollo P, Xhepa E, Kufner S, Strehle A, Leggewie S, Allali A, Ndrepepa G, Schühlen H, Angiolillo DJ, Hamm CW, Hapfelmeier A, Tölg R, Trenk D, Schunkert H, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A; ISAR-REACT 5 Trial Investigators. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1524-1534.
  22. Krychtiuk KA, Ahrens I, Drexel H, Halvorsen S, Hassager C, Huber K, Kurpas D, Niessner A, Schiele F, Semb AG, Sionis A, Claeys MJ, Barrabes J, Montero S, Sinnaeve P, Pedretti R, Catapano A. Acute LDL-C reduction post ACS: strike early and strike strong: from evidence to clinical practice. A clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), in collaboration with the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Dec 27;11(12):939-949.
  23. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, Claeys MJ, Dan GA, Dweck MR, Galbraith M, Gilard M, Hinterbuchner L, Jankowska EA, Jüni P, Kimura T, Kunadian V, Leosdottir M, Lorusso R, Pedretti RFE, Rigopoulos AG, Rubini Gimenez M, Thiele H, Vranckx P, Wassmann S, Wenger NK, Ibanez B; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826.
  24. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimský P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177.
  25. Navarese EP, Kowalewski M, Andreotti F, van Wely M, Camaro C, Kolodziejczak M, Gorny B, Wirianta J, Kubica J, Kelm M, de Boer MJ, Suryapranata H. Meta-analysis of time-related benefits of statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 15;113(10):1753-64.
  26. Boekholdt SM, Hovingh GK, Mora S, Arsenault BJ, Amarenco P, Pedersen TR, LaRosa JC, Waters DD, DeMicco DA, Simes RJ, Keech AC, Colquhoun D, Hitman GA, Betteridge DJ, Clearfield MB, Downs JR, Colhoun HM, Gotto AM Jr, Ridker PM, Grundy SM, Kastelein JJ. Very low levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and the risk for cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of statin trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 5;64(5):485-94.
  27. LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, Shear C, Barter P, Fruchart JC, Gotto AM, Greten H, Kastelein JJ, Shepherd J, Wenger NK; Treating to New Targets (TNT) Investigators. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 7;352(14):1425-35.
  28. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, Sever PS, Pedersen TR; FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):1713-1722.
  29. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, Edelberg JM, Goodman SG, Hanotin C, Harrington RA, Jukema JW, Lecorps G, Mahaffey KW, Moryusef A, Pordy R, Quintero K, Roe MT, Sasiela WJ, Tamby JF, Tricoci P, White HD, Zeiher AM; ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Committees and Investigators. Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2097-2107.
  30. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration; Fulcher J, O'Connell R, Voysey M, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Mihaylova B, Simes J, Collins R, Kirby A, Colhoun H, Braunwald E, La Rosa J, Pedersen TR, Tonkin A, Davis B, Sleight P, Franzosi MG, Baigent C, Keech A. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015 Apr 11;385(9976):1397-405.
  31. Pitt B, Loscalzo J, Ycas J, Raichlen JS. Lipid levels after acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Apr 15;51(15):1440-5.
  32. Shrivastava AK, Singh HV, Raizada A, Singh SK. Serial measurement of lipid profile and inflammatory markers in patients with acute myocardial infarction. EXCLI J. 2015 Apr 10;14:517-26.
  33. Sidhu D, Naugler C. Fasting time and lipid levels in a community-based population: a cross-sectional study. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Dec 10;172(22):1707-10.
  34. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, Darius H, Lewis BS, Ophuis TO, Jukema JW, De Ferrari GM, Ruzyllo W, De Lucca P, Im K, Bohula EA, Reist C, Wiviott SD, Tershakovec AM, Musliner TA, Braunwald E, Califf RM; IMPROVE-IT Investigators. Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2387-97.
  35. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA, Ketchum SB, Doyle RT Jr, Juliano RA, Jiao L, Granowitz C, Tardif JC, Ballantyne CM; REDUCE-IT Investigators. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 3;380(1):11-22.
  36. Pedersen TR, Cater NB, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJ, Olsson AG, Tikkanen MJ, Holme I, Larsen ML, Lindahl C, Szarek M. Comparison of atorvastatin 80 mg/day versus simvastatin 20 to 40 mg/day on frequency of cardiovascular events late (five years) after acute myocardial infarction (from the Incremental Decrease in End Points through Aggressive Lipid Lowering [IDEAL] trial). Am J Cardiol. 2010 Aug 1;106(3):354-9.
  37. Tikkanen MJ, Szarek M, Fayyad R, Holme I, Cater NB, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJ, Olsson AG, Larsen ML, Lindahl C, Pedersen TR; IDEAL Investigators. Total cardiovascular disease burden: comparing intensive with moderate statin therapy insights from the IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 15;54(25):2353-7.
  38. Li C, Lin L, Zhang W, Zhou L, Wang H, Luo X, Luo H, Cai Y, Zeng C. Efficiency and safety of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 monoclonal antibody on hypercholesterolemia: a meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 15;4(6):e001937.
  39. Zhang XL, Zhu QQ, Zhu L, Chen JZ, Chen QH, Li GN, Xie J, Kang LN, Xu B. Safety and efficacy of anti-PCSK9 antibodies: a meta-analysis of 25 randomized, controlled trials. BMC Med. 2015 Jun 23;13:123.
  40. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Wiviott SD, Raal FJ, Blom DJ, Robinson J, Ballantyne CM, Somaratne R, Legg J, Wasserman SM, Scott R, Koren MJ, Stein EA; Open-Label Study of Long-Term Evaluation against LDL Cholesterol (OSLER) Investigators. Efficacy and safety of evolocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 16;372(16):1500-9.
  41. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, Bergeron J, Luc G, Averna M, Stroes ES, Langslet G, Raal FJ, El Shahawy M, Koren MJ, Lepor NE, Lorenzato C, Pordy R, Chaudhari U, Kastelein JJ; ODYSSEY LONG TERM Investigators. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 16;372(16):1489-99.
  42. Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Schulze V, Gurbel PA, Tantry U, Lin Y, Brockmeyer M, Kandzari DE, Kubica JM, D'Agostino RB Sr, Kubica J, Volpe M, Agewall S, Kereiakes DJ, Kelm M. Effects of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibodies in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jul 7;163(1):40-51.

Notes to editor


Authors:

Luigina Guasti 1, MD, PhD, FAHA, FESC; Alessandro Lupi 2, MD

1. Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy;  

2. Cardiology Department, Hospital San Biagio (Ospedale San Biagio), Domodossola VB, Italy

 

Address for correspondence:

Assoc. Prof Guasti, Via Guicciardini 5 Varese, Italy

E-mail: luigina.guasti@uninsubria.it

 

Author disclosures:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this article.

 

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.