In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.

Hot Line: Should aspirin be interrupted in patients with coronary stents undergoing non-cardiac surgery?

01 Sep 2024

“Current guidelines recommend continuing aspirin in patients with drug-eluting stents (DES) undergoing non-cardiac surgery;1 however, supporting evidence is limited. The ASSURE DES trial compared the efficacy and safety of continuing aspirin monotherapy vs. temporarily withholding all antiplatelet therapy around the time of non-cardiac surgery,” explained Doctor Jung-Min Ahn (Asan Medical Center - Seoul, South Korea).

ASSURE DES was an investigator-initiated, open-label trial, in which patients who had undergone DES implantation more than 1 year earlier, and who were now undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery, were randomised to continue aspirin or discontinue all antiplatelet therapy 5 days before surgery. Antiplatelets were recommended to be resumed no later than 48 hours after surgery, unless contraindicated. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis or stroke between 5 days before to 30 days after non-cardiac surgery. 

The trial included 926 patients, who had a mean age of 68.5 years and 24% were women. On average, DES was implanted 6.3 years before non-cardiac surgery and 84% had second-generation or newer stents. At randomisation, 39% of patients were on aspirin monotherapy, 23% on P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy and 34% were on dual antiplatelet therapy.

There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the groups at 30 days.

The primary outcome occurred in 0.6% of patients with aspirin and 0.9% with no antiplatelets (absolute difference −0.2 percentage points; 95% CI −1.3 to 0.9; p>0.99). Rates of the primary outcome events were low: 2 patients died from cardiac causes and 3 had an MI in the aspirin group, while 3 patients had an MI and 1 had a stroke in the no antiplatelets group.

Major bleeding rates were similar between the groups: 6.5% with aspirin and 5.2% with no antiplatelets (p=0.39), while minor bleeding was more frequent with aspirin (14.9% vs. 10.1%; p=0.027).

“Continuing aspirin monotherapy did not reduce ischaemic events, although it was associated with a modest increase in minor bleeding. The low event rate – which may reflect the safety profile of contemporary DES – led to the trial being underpowered and our overall findings should be interpreted with caution. However, it seems a flexible approach to perioperative antiplatelet management may be considered, without compromising patient safety,” concluded Dr. Ahn.

References

  1. Halvorsen S, et al. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3826–3924.
Data Privacy: During the congress your online activity is tracked and collected by the ESC. We use this to award your CME credits; for reporting and statistical purposes; and to provide you with the best experience.
Please note your details will be shared with the sponsor of any Industry Session, Tutorial or Exhibition you choose to view. More information is available in the ESC Congress 2024 London Registration terms and conditions